© All rights reserved. The trade union press is hearby authorised to use this material. E-mail your comments, questions and subscription requests to get the latest stories from this service sent free of charge directly to your e-mailbox. The news service is sponsored by SAK, the largest central trade union in Finland, and eleven of its 24 affiliated unions. |
![]() Gender Equality, Work Organisation and Well-being: Equality Standards for a Good Workplace - a Finnish research and development project (18.11.1999 - Kaisa Kauppinen*, Leenamaija Otala*) Over the last decades, the activity rate of women in paid work has increased throughout Europe and has been one of the major changes affecting our societies in general, and workplaces in particular. In Finland, the activity rate of women has traditionally been high and today it is almost identical with that of men. Many reasons explain this increase: the recognition of women's high level of education, the wish for autonomy, and the necessity of a double income. Women still face problems at work when striving for the same status as men (the "glass ceiling"), and they are still overwhelmingly responsible for the family and domestic duties. The gender segregation of Finnish worklife is strong and it extends both across and within occupations. Women's jobs are characterised by elements of caring, nurturing and supportive roles, while men monopolise the 'heavy' manual, technical and managerial tasks. There is a risk for increased gender segregation.
At the income policy talks, in autumn 1997, the labour market organisations agreed, inter alias, on the Equal Work Community research and development project. The project was carried out in close collaboration with the employers' and employees' central organisations. The point of departure was that both parties should benefit. The common belief was that an equal workplace would benefit both employers and employees alike. Similar work is also being done in Sweden. The Swedish Minister of Equality brought forth the idea of an equality symbol to be used in the same way as the environment symbol.
Nine organisations participated in the project. They were both female-dominated and male-dominated, reflecting the high degree of gender segregation in Finnish worklife. The companies represented both traditional Finnish industrial sectors, e.g., paper mill and confectionery factory, as well as the new rapidly growing high-tech areas. The project was aimed at creating a set of quality standards to promote equality at work. These could be used to measure the state of equality at the workplace and to uncover aspects requiring development. The aim was to see gender equality not merely as an ethical norm but as an economic concept on its own, as a factor of well-being, profitability and public image. The data collection was based on qualitative and quantitative methods: expert interviews, dialogue workshops, and standard as well as open-ended questionnaires. The sample size for the questionnaire study was 521 (60% women).
Women noticed more shortcomings in equality in the work organisations than did men. Disturbances in well-being, a strained work atmosphere, and conflicts at work were also cited. Men were less concerned about these issues than women. It was quite common for women to consider their gender a disadvantage in at least some form. This disadvantage was felt to be greatest in pay, career advancement, and the fair distribution of the work load. There were also incidences of sexual harassment, mostly in the form of verbal
harassment. Altogether 24% of the women and 12% of the men were annoyed by dirty jokes and
unwanted sexual comments at the workplace. As harassment significantly contributed to job
dissatisfaction and stress, it is important to ensure a harassment-free workplace culture.
Regardless of the high degree of stress and competitive atmosphere in the workplaces, the majority of the men and women were satisfied with their work and felt competent at work. An important factor was the feeling that women and men had equal opportunities, and fairness in treatment prevailed.
In each standard, equality is mainstreamed so that each question is evaluated according to equality. Equality and its state
Salary and remuneration policy
Career and work opportunities
Common goals and opportunities for influence and control
Workplace atmosphere and feeling of togetherness
Information flow and openness in information delivery
Working conditions
Reconciling work and family life (private life)
By further developing these standards, a comprehensive system can be formed. * The writers are the authors of the study "Gender Equility, Work Organisation and Well-being: Equality Standards for a Good Workplace" (Helsinki, 1999) |
|